|

DEAD
OAKS HAVE MORE CHARACTER THAN MANY LIVING PEOPLE
How
are they doing one year after this page was posted?
Photo:
Zoe Nathan
.
PART
ONE: A FAMILY STORY My
point of view writing about oaks and vineyards.
PART TWO: OAK TREES: MAGIC OR WEEDS?
Focuses on California oaks and my life with them. This section
outlines the challenges faced by California oaks today.
PART
THREE: PROTECTING THE OAKS UNDER
CONSTRUCTION-- Photos still up for your
enjoyment.
PART
FOUR: LESSONS IN ECONOMICS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION--
Photos still up for your enjoyment.
PART
FIVE: AFTER THE STORM Are oaks
safe now? UNDER CONSTRUCTION
-- Photos still up for your
enjoyment.
AFTER
THE STORM
I posted this
series of articles about the decimation of California's oaks by
vineyards about six years ago. The November election, featuring
two initiatives which promised to prevent wholesale destruction
of oaks, was coming right up. A neighbor threatened to entertain
us all with "events" held at his winery. The wineries
were covering the county at a pace I could never have predicted.
What's happened since?
1.
ELECTION NEWS: Both "oak protection" Initiatives
failed. Measure K, signed by 19,700 people, would have protected
heritage trees, required the County to insure no net loss of trees,
set up standards for identifying endangered trees and limited
numbers of trees a landowner can cut. Measure K was defeated by
a couple thousand votes.
Measure
O, drafted by Kendall Jackson Winery's attorney, was signed by
six people and put on the ballot by the Board of Supervisors "to
give the people a choice", at a cost of $150,000 to the taxpayers.
The Measure outlined protections so broad that only trees bigger
than any I have ever seen would be protected. The electorate defeated
K resoundingly.
Are
the oaks protected from vineyards in Santa Barbara County? Not
at all.
2.
MORE ELECTION NEWS: Although the Initiatives failed, the political
process resulted in a change in voting composition among the Board
of Supervisors. The Board of Sups had been stacked 3 to 2 in favor
of agri/business. This meant that 6 people could go to the Board
and get an initiative doing almost nothing to protect oaks put
on the ballot days before an election. The citizens elected a
new supervisor with different sympathies. Now the Board is stacked
3 to 2 "against" agribusiness.
The
new Board passed a grading ordinance which requires anyone doing
grading over a certain number of cubic yards to get a permit.
Farmers and ranchers are apoplectic over this intrusion of government
onto their property rights.
Does
this protect the oaks? No. But you have to get a grading permit
before 'dozing them.
3. HOW ABOUT THE GUY WHO WANTED THE AMPLIFIED CONCERTS IN A
RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD?
I
went to the public meeting to appeal Bridlewood Winery's being
granted a permit to have 12 lighted, amplified "events"
a year in a residential neighborhood. My neighborhood, as a matter
of fact. A fascinating sociological event. If you read "Drugs,
Sex, and Rock'n'Roll", you will know that a new vintner
was granted permission to hold these events by the County Planning
Commission because no one knew about it! That's right. No one
in the four subdivisions behind the winery was notified. Oh,
well, these things happen. When we found out-- Oh boy! This public
meeting was the one occasion where the entire community came together--
in a jammed church no less-- and condemned the hapless applicant.
He was notably shaken and proclaimed before hundreds of people
that he would withdraw his application for "events".
We went home, feeling a miracle had occurred.
A
few weeks later, I heard he'd been granted permission for 6 events
a year. I see tour buses and such going in and out every day.
HAS
THE ISSUE BEEN SETTLED? Nope. Meetings to discuss another
new winery and to clarify County policies about wineries in "intermediate"
areas-- not totally rural, but not in town, either-- happen regularly.
Other vintner's wanted far more than Bridlewood's hapless owner:
one right around the corner wanted 23 events a year, most
amplified and all serving wine, with clean up until midnight in
some cases. Included in the package were wine tastings 365 days
a year, and a grape crushing and bottling plant serving the entire
Valley. This would have occurred on the major thoroughfare into
town for four residential subdivisions, and the route to and from
the local high school. The plan did not go through: the County
and its residents continue to struggle with issues and definitions.

Photo:
Zoe Nathan
4.
WHAT CAN BE DONE? Not much other than attending public meetings.
This is the tip of the iceberg. Fess Parker and his wife have
recently purchased 1,400 prime acres of oak savanna for a new
winery. (They already own one winery in the Valley.) The Parker's
have also purchased the hotel the little town of Los Olivos and
have obtained permission to build another hotel in the same town.
One wag suggested renaming the town "Parkerville." The
formerly charming Los Olivos now looks like a wine shop with Realtors'
offices. The president of the local cattleman's association just
sold his ranch to Kendall Jackson Winery, the folks who ignited
the controversy by bulldozing 840 2-300 year old oaks in full
view of commuters. See Part 2, Oak Trees:
Magic or Weeds?, and Part 3, Lessons In
Politics." The drive to Santa Maria, thirty miles north
of Santa Ynez, is almost entirely through a corridor of vineyards.
The corridor extends, oh, about to Clear Lake, 400 miles away.
With a few breaks, for cities and such.
"What's
wrong with that?" you may say. Nothing, if it's sustainable
and the vintners pay all the costs associated with their operations.
Read "Part 4, Lessons in Economics."
AS
OF 7/01, WINERIES ARE NOW ON OUR STREET, moving down our
access road, and covering Santa Ynez Valley at rates I couldn't
have predicted.
5.
IS IT ALL ROSY? Beats me. I don't have access to winemakers'
financial sheets, but I from what I've heard, some of what I predicted
in Oak Trees and Vineyards, Part 4: Lessons
in Economics is happening. A friend over in the Santa Rosa
Road area of Buellton said that his vintner neighbors didn't bother
to harvest their grapes last year, the prices were so low. It's
EXPECTATION of profits that's the motivator. People are
moved to do things--- invest their life's savings, for instance--
on the expectation of making money. If everyone is doing it--
supply increases, price falls. No profit: so sorry. Resources
flow out. Elementary economics.
If
this is happening: I did tell you so, not that it's much satisfaction.

Photo:
Zoe Nathan
REALLY,
WHAT CAN BE DONE?
I've
gotten agonized e-mail saying, "They're bulldozing 50 big
oak trees down the street. How can I stop them? Isn't there a
state law?" No. Maybe a few local ones. Usually not. Lots
of money is involved in the wineries. No one can make a living
cattle ranching now, so the ranchers sell out. It's in their best
interests. Truly. We're seeing the operation of economic forces
and greed. Powerful people who need more.
The
only recourse is to get political and get some laws and ordinances
passed to protect oak trees. This series of articles shows just
how hard that is. I doubt any County in the state is more environmentally
conscious than Santa Barbara.
After
the collapse of the Oak Initiatives, I thought I'd write an upbeat
final article for this series highlighting the cooperative approach
as the way to protect the oaks. Santa Barbara County's ongoing
cooperative effort continues to search for solutions to oak protection.
I attended several of the cooperative meetings before getting
depressed at the lack of cooperative teeth. But it turned out
that they did get some good results. Voluntarily reforesting an
area. I don't know that they've kept any oaks from being cut.
But still, the cooperative approach seemed the most viable.
As
I was about to begin writing, the newspaper ran a story about
the last cooperative meeting degenerating into a shouting match.
All the strong feelings that everyone had stuffed while they were
being "facilitated" and "moderated" erupted.
Boom!
They're
still meeting.
What
is the best approach? Beats me.
WHAT
AM I DOING? I'm writing this series, doing my best
to get the problem public. I go to meetings. Speak out. I served
on the Valley Blueprint Committee, working on guidelines to development
in Santa Ynez Valley. Will they be followed? Who knows?
WILL
ANY OF IT HELP?
This
is a philosophical issue. Humanity seems to be the only species
which wantonly destroys its own environment, makes anything
and everything into an addiction, and misses or defiles
that which is most beautiful.
Can
anything help us?

Photo:
Zoe Nathan
AUTHOR SANDY NATHAN IS THE WINNER OF EIGHT NATIONAL AWARDS!

SANDY NATHAN
Click to go to sandynathan.com

IT'S OUT! New from SANDY NATHAN!
Sandy Nathan's NEW book NUMENON has WON TWO NATIONAL AWARDS before publication!
Click here to hear Sandy speak on Fascinating Authors.
FOR
INFORMATION & PERSONAL ASSISTANCE CONTACT:
M. A. D. D.: MOTHER'S AGAINST DRUNK
DRIVING
ANTI-
ADDICTION SELF HELP RESOURCES
SPURS
MAGAZINE INDEX
RANCHO VILASA HOME
E-MAIL
US
OUR BOOKSTORE BENEFITS CHARITY
Copyright
1999-2007. Sandra Nathan. All rights reserved.
|